02062    a2200385   4500001001100000005001700011008004000028020001800068037003600086040000700122041000800129072001600137072001600153072001600169072001800185072001500203072001600218072001300234072001300247072001400260072001400274072001300288072001400301072002100315072002100336072002100357072001700378100001800395245006200413250000600475260003200481300001000513520113800523999001501661103209192420250317100400.0250312042021GB        4           eng    a9781032091921  bTaylor & FranciscGBP 41.99fBB  a01  aeng7 aQDTS2thema7 aQDTQ2thema7 aJPFK2thema7 aJBSF112thema7 aJHB2thema7 aJBSF2thema7 aHPS2bic7 aHPQ2bic7 aJPFK2bic7 aJFFK2bic7 aJHB2bic7 aJFSJ2bic7 aPHI0190002bisac7 aPHI0050002bisac7 aPHI0000002bisac7 a362.12bisac1 aAsha Bhandary10aFreedom to CarebLiberalism, Dependency Care, and Culture  a1  aOxfordbRoutledgec20210630  a232 p  bThis book presents the first systematic account of dependency care in a liberal theory of justice. Despite the fact that receiving dependency care is necessary for human survival, the practices with which we meet society’s care needs are seldom recognized for their functional role. Instead, norms about gender and race obscure and shape expectations about whose needs for care are legitimate as well as about whose caregiving labor more advantaged members of society will receive. These opaque arrangements must be made visible if we are to remedy skewed intuitions and judgements about care. Freedom to Care develops a modified form of social contract theory with which to evaluate society’s caregiving arrangements. Building on work by feminist liberals and care ethicists, it reframes debates about care to move beyond gender with an inequality-tracking framework that can be employed in any culture. Because care provision has been enmeshed in the subordination of women and people of color, eliminating the invisibility of these forms of labor yields a critical liberal theory of justice with feminist and anti-racist aims.  c1128d1128