01701    a2200277   4500001001100000005001700011008003900028020001800067037003600085040000700121041000800128072001600136072001600152072001400168072001400182072002100196072002100217072001800238100001900256245009900275250000600374260003200380300001000412520098600422999001501408185575883020250317100400.0250312042011GB                   eng    a9781855758834  bTaylor & FranciscGBP 37.99fBB  a01  aeng7 aMKMT2thema7 aJMAF2thema7 aMMJT2bic7 aJMAF2bic7 aPSY0000002bisac7 aPSY0360002bisac7 a616.892bisac1 aThomas Dalzell10aFreud's Schreber Between Psychiatry and PsychoanalysisbOn Subjective Disposition to Psychosis  a1  aOxfordbRoutledgec20110315  a422 p  bThis book investigates what was distinctive about the predisposition to psychosis Freud posited in Daniel Paul Schreber, a presiding judge in Saxony's highest court. It argues that Freud's 1911 Schreber text reversed the order of priority in late nineteenth-century conceptions of the disposing causes of psychosis - the objective-biological and subjective-biographical - to privilege subjective disposition to psychosis, but without returning to the paradigms of early nineteenth-century Romantic psychiatry and without obviating the legitimate claims of biological psychiatry in relation to hereditary disposition. While Schreber is the book's reference point, this is not a general treatment of Schreber, or of Freud's reading of the Schreber case. It focuses rather on what was new in Freud's thinking on the disposition to psychosis, what he learned from his psychiatrist contemporaries and what he did not, and whether or not psychoanalysts have fully received his aetiology.  c1137d1137