02095    a2200349   4500001001100000005001700011008003900028020001800067037003600085040000700121041000800128072001600136072001600152072001400168072001300182072001300195072001200208072002100220072002100241072002100262072002100283072001900304100002100323245006600344250000600410260003200416300001000448520122300458700002801681700002101709999001501730103208996220250317100406.0250312042021GB                   eng    a9781032089966  bTaylor & FranciscGBP 41.99fBB  a01  aeng7 aQDTS2thema7 aQDTQ2thema7 aJP2thema7 aHPS2bic7 aHPQ2bic7 aJP2bic7 aEDU0400002bisac7 aPHI0190002bisac7 aPOL0000002bisac7 aSOC0310002bisac7 a320.0112bisac1 aDavid V. Axelsen10aLuck EgalitarianismbKasper Lippert-Rasmussen and His Critics  a1  aOxfordbRoutledgec20210630  a152 p  bThis edited volume offers a critical discussion of luck egalitarianism – one of the most prominent views in contemporary political philosophy – through an exploration of the theory of one of its leading proponents, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. When (if ever) can inequalities in how well peoples’ lives go be justified? Luck egalitarianism provides an appealing answer: inequalities are just if, and only if, they are the result of the exercise of individual responsibility. Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen lucidly defends and specifies this view in his own book Luck Egalitarianism . The authors in this volume offer a critical discussion of the key features of his view. They discuss disagreements within views which assign an important role to responsibility. They go on to push the limits of luck egalitarianism: what about inequalities between us and the dead? And inequalities between groups? Finally, they criticize some of the central tenets of luck egalitarianism, including its tendency to avoid action-guiding judgements and its focus on distributions rather than interpersonal relations. This book was originally published as a special issue of Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.1 aJuliana Bidadanure4B011 aTim Meijers4B01  c1813d1813