02575    a2200481   4500001001100000005001700011008004000028020001800068037003600086040000700122041000800129072001500137072001600152072001500168072001500183072001600198072001600214072001500230072001300245072001300258072001300271072001300284072001300297072001400310072001300324072002100337072002100358072002100379072002100400072002100421072002100442072002100463072002100484072002100505072001700526100002300543245008600566250000600652260003200658300001000690520137800700999001502078131539100720250317111627.0250312042019GB        2           eng    a9781315391007  bTaylor & FranciscGBP 34.99fBB  a01  aeng7 aKCA2thema7 aQDTS2thema7 aJPA2thema7 aKCP2thema7 aQDTQ2thema7 aJPHV2thema7 aJPP2thema7 aKCA2bic7 aHPS2bic7 aJPA2bic7 aKCP2bic7 aHPQ2bic7 aJPHV2bic7 aJPP2bic7 aPHI0190002bisac7 aBUS0690302bisac7 aBUS0000002bisac7 aBUS0690002bisac7 aPHI0050002bisac7 aPHI0340002bisac7 aPOL0070002bisac7 aPOL0100002bisac7 aPOL0240002bisac7 a321.82bisac1 aJulian F. Müller10aPolitical Pluralism, Disagreement and JusticebThe Case for Polycentric Democracy  a1  aOxfordbRoutledgec20190510  a234 p  bThis book poses the question: How can we organize society in such a way that our disagreement about facts and norms works to the benefit of everyone? In response, it makes the argument for polycentric democracy, a political arrangement consisting of various political units that enjoy different degrees of independence. It is argued that to progress towards justice, we first need to change our attitude towards reasonable disagreement. Theorists have always viewed reasonable disagreement as nuisance, if not as a threat. However, this work puts forward that the diversity of perspectives which underlie reasonable disagreement should be viewed as a resource to be harvested rather than a threat to be tamed. Resting on two key arguments, the author proposes the idea of polycentric democracy as the most capable method of making pluralism productive. The book explores what such a political order might look like and concludes that only an institutional system which is capable of profiting from diversity, such as polycentric democracy, might reasonably be expected to generate an overlapping consensus. Continuing in the tradition of Karl Popper and Friedrich August von Hayek, this book lies at the intersection of philosophy, political economy and political theory. It will be of great interest to academics and scholars working in philosophy, politics and economics.  c6390d6390