| 000 | 01701 a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1855758830 | ||
| 005 | 20250317100400.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042011GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781855758834 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 37.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aMKMT _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJMAF _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aMMJT _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJMAF _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPSY000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPSY036000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a616.89 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aThomas Dalzell | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFreud's Schreber Between Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis _bOn Subjective Disposition to Psychosis |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20110315 |
||
| 300 | _a422 p | ||
| 520 | _bThis book investigates what was distinctive about the predisposition to psychosis Freud posited in Daniel Paul Schreber, a presiding judge in Saxony's highest court. It argues that Freud's 1911 Schreber text reversed the order of priority in late nineteenth-century conceptions of the disposing causes of psychosis - the objective-biological and subjective-biographical - to privilege subjective disposition to psychosis, but without returning to the paradigms of early nineteenth-century Romantic psychiatry and without obviating the legitimate claims of biological psychiatry in relation to hereditary disposition. While Schreber is the book's reference point, this is not a general treatment of Schreber, or of Freud's reading of the Schreber case. It focuses rather on what was new in Freud's thinking on the disposition to psychosis, what he learned from his psychiatrist contemporaries and what he did not, and whether or not psychoanalysts have fully received his aetiology. | ||
| 999 |
_c1137 _d1137 |
||