000 | 02600 a2200349 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1317748395 | ||
005 | 20250317100411.0 | ||
008 | 250312042018GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781317748397 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 18.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aLB _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAF _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLNT _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLB _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAF _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLNT _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW000000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW089000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW111000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPOL010000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a340.9 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aMariano Croce | |
245 | 1 | 0 | _aPolitics of Juridification |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20180206 |
||
300 | _a100 p | ||
520 | _bThe Politics of Juridification offers a timely contribution to debates about how politics is being affected by the increasing relevance of judicial bodies to the daily administration of Western political communities. While most critical analyses portray juridification as a depoliticizing, de-democratizing transferral of political authority to the courts (whether national or international), this book centres on the workable ambivalence of such a far-reaching phenomenon. While juridification certainly intensifies the power and competences of judicial bodies to the disadvantage of representative political institutions, it cannot be easily reduced to the demise of democratic politics. By focusing on the multiple ways in which social agents make use of the law, The Politics of Juridification teases out the agential and transformative aspects of the various negotiations social agents engage with legal institutions with a view to obtaining political visibility. In particular, the book homes in on two seemingly distinct phenomena: on one hand, the regulation of sexuality and emerging kinship formations; on the other, the fragmentation of legal settings due to the claims to legal autonomy advanced by sub-state cultural and religious groups. By doing so, the book makes the case for an unexpected convergence between the struggles for legal recognition of sexual minorities and religious and cultural minorities. The conclusion is that juridification does entail normalization and favour the infiltration of law into the social realm. But because of its ambivalent nature, it can and does serve as an alternative vehicle for social change – one that attaches more importance to how social agents produce law on a daily basis and how this law permeates official legal orders. | ||
999 |
_c2344 _d2344 |