000 | 02032 a2200313 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 113827707X | ||
005 | 20250317100413.0 | ||
008 | 250312042016GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781138277076 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 51.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aRGC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPWS _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aRGC _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPWS _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPOL062000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSCI030000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a355.02 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aScott Kirsch | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aReconstructing Conflict _bIntegrating War and Post-War Geographies |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20161116 |
||
300 | _a344 p | ||
520 | _bReconstruction - the rebuilding of state, economy, culture and society in the wake of war - is a powerful idea, and a profoundly transformative one. From the refashioning of new landscapes in bombed-out cities and towns to the reframing of national identities to accommodate changed historical narratives, the term has become synonymous with notions of "post-conflict" society; it draws much of its rhetorical power from the neat demarcation, both spatially and temporally, between war and peace. The reality is far more complex. In this volume, reconstruction is identified as a process of conflict and of militarized power, not something that clearly demarcates a post-war period of peace. Kirsch and Flint bring together an internationally diverse range of studies by leading scholars to examine how periods of war and other forms of political violence have been justified as processes of necessary and valid reconstruction as well as the role of war in catalyzing the construction of new political institutions and destroying old regimes. Challenging the false dichotomy between war and peace, this book explores instead the ways that war and peace are mutually constituted in the creation of historically specific geographies and geographical knowledges. | ||
700 | 1 |
_aColin Flint _4B01 |
|
999 |
_c2554 _d2554 |