000 02582 a2200421 4500
001 036767033X
005 20250317100413.0
008 250312042020GB eng
020 _a9780367670337
037 _bTaylor & Francis
_cGBP 22.99
_fBB
040 _a01
041 _aeng
072 7 _aNHTQ
_2thema
072 7 _aN
_2thema
072 7 _aNHF
_2thema
072 7 _aNHD
_2thema
072 7 _aJP
_2thema
072 7 _aGTM
_2thema
072 7 _a1FPC
_2bisac
072 7 _a3MPQ
_2bisac
072 7 _aHBTQ
_2bic
072 7 _aHBLW3
_2bic
072 7 _aHBJF
_2bic
072 7 _aHBJD1
_2bic
072 7 _aJP
_2bic
072 7 _aGTB
_2bic
072 7 _a1FPC
_2bisac
072 7 _aHIS000000
_2bisac
072 7 _aHIS008000
_2bisac
072 7 _aHIS015000
_2bisac
072 7 _a951.2505
_2bisac
100 1 _aR. B. E. Price
245 1 0 _aResistance in Colonial and Communist China, 1950-1963
_bAnatomy of a Riot
250 _a1
260 _aOxford
_bRoutledge
_c20200930
300 _a126 p
520 _bThe history of colonial East Asia is a human anatomy describing beneficial organs of foreign rule. Proclaiming itself a schematic diagram open to inspection, the anatomy of the late British Empire nevertheless obscured much more than it revealed. This analogy in Price’s provocative Cold War history is not presented only as an insight on imperialism but deciphers competing nationalist ideologies, too. The Kuomintang contended vigorously against communist rule in southern China for a decade after the end of the civil war in 1949 and Chinese communists disparaged British colonialism in Hong Kong in a war of words peaking in 1956–1957. These clashes of will did not produce new rulers in either place. They informed a period of Sino-British strategic partnership based on recognition that a capitalist enclave in southern China had its uses. By focusing on the Hong Kong region, Resistance in Colonial and Communist China compares anatomies of the British colonial government, the Chinese communists and stateless members of the remnant Kuomintang (1950–1963). Price asserts that after 1949, the colonial government of Hong Kong politically favoured the Kuomintang organised crime societies over their communist nationalist adversaries despite historiographical explanation that it favoured neither. This book challenges traditional concepts of the British colonial government and its attitude towards communist China. It engages in current debates surrounding Britain’s past by presenting a particularly devious episode of late colonial history.
999 _c2621
_d2621