| 000 | 01882 a2200337 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1138950599 | ||
| 005 | 20250317100352.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042015GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781138950597 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 43.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aJW _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aGTM _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJP _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a1F _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJW _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aGTB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJP _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a1F _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aSOC008000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aSOC053000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a355.03305 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aWilliam Tow | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBilateralism, Multilateralism and Asia-Pacific Security _bContending Cooperation |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20150723 |
||
| 300 | _a240 p | ||
| 520 | _bMany scholars of international relations in Asia regard bilateralism and multilateralism as alternative and mutually exclusive approaches to security co-operation. They argue that multilateral associations such as ASEAN will eventually replace the system of bilateral alliances which were the predominant form of U.S. security co-operation with Asia-Pacific allies during the Cold War. Yet these bilateral alliances continue to be the primary means of the United States’ strategic engagement with the region. This book contends that bilateralism and multilateralism are not mutually exclusive, and that bilateralism is likely to continue strong even as multilateralism strengthens. It explores a wide range of issues connected with this question. It discusses how US bilateral alliances have been reinvigorated in recent years, examines how bilateral and multilateral approaches to specific problems can work alongside each other, and concludes by considering how patterns of international security are likely to develop in the region in future. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aBrendan Taylor _4B01 |
|
| 999 |
_c263 _d263 |
||