| 000 | 02657 a2200553 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1134689594 | ||
| 005 | 20250317100352.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042014GB 44 eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781134689590 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 47.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNCB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNK _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNKJ _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aTVB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKNA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPST _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aGTP _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRND _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNF _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNT _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRGC _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNR _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJP _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNCB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNK _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNKJ _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aTVB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKNAC _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPST _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aGTF _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRND _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNF _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNT _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRGC _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNR _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJP _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aNAT011000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aNAT010000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aNAT038000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a344.046 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aDaniel F. Robinson | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBiodiversity, Access and Benefit-Sharing _bGlobal Case Studies |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20141113 |
||
| 300 | _a228 p | ||
| 520 | _bThe Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is rapidly receiving signatures and ratifications. Many countries are preparing to implement the protocol through national research permit systems and/or biodiversity laws. Yet there is still considerable confusion about how to implement the Protocol, regarding access and benefit-sharing (ABS) procedures, and minimal experience in many countries. This book seeks to remedy this gap in understanding by analysing a number of ABS case studies in light of the Nagoya Protocol. The case studies are wide-ranging, with examples of plants for medicinal, cosmetic, biotech and food products from or for development in Australia, North Africa, Madagascar, Switzerland, Thailand, USA and Oceania. These will encourage countries to develop national systems which maximise their benefits (both monetary and non-monetary) towards conservation and support for local communities that hold traditional knowledge. In addition, the author analyses new expectations raised by the Nagoya Protocol, such as the encouragement of the development of community protocols by indigenous and local communities. As a result, stakeholders and policy-makers will be able to learn the steps involved in establishing ABS agreements, issues that arise between stakeholders, and the types of benefits that might be realistic. | ||
| 999 |
_c266 _d266 |
||