| 000 | 01781 a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1138868159 | ||
| 005 | 20250317100415.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042015GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781138868151 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 46.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aNHTB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aNHD _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a3M _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHBTB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHBJD1 _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a3J _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHIS000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a373.4209034 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aProf John Roach | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSecondary Education in England 1870-1902 _bPublic Activity and Private Enterprise |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20150427 |
||
| 300 | _a296 p | ||
| 520 | _bIn this comprehensive and extensively researched history, John Roach argues for a reassessment of the relative importance of State regulation and private provision. Although the public schools enjoyed their greatest prestige during this period, in terms of educational reform and progress their importance has been exaggerated. The role of the public school, he suggests, was social rather than academic, and as such their power and influence is to be interpreted principally in relation to the growth of new social elites, the concept of public service and the needs of the empire for a bureaucratic ruling class. Only in the modern progressive movement, launched by Cecil Reddie, and the private provision for young women, was lasting progress made. Even before the 1902 Education Act however the State had spent much time and effort regulating and reforming the old educational endowments, and it is in these initiatives that the foundations for the public provision of secondary educational reform are to be found. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aJohn Roach _4A01 |
|
| 999 |
_c2834 _d2834 |
||