000 | 02069 a2200241 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1138996580 | ||
005 | 20250317100417.0 | ||
008 | 250312042015GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781138996588 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 45.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aJHBA _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHBA _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSOC026000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a302 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aDerek Layder | |
245 | 1 | 0 | _aStructure, Interaction and Social Theory (RLE Social Theory) |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20151221 |
||
300 | _a164 p | ||
520 | _bA central problem in contemporary social theory is that of providing an account of social interaction that does justice both to the self-monitoring capacities of the individuals involved and to the society that ‘frames’ the interaction. This book attempts to resolve this problem, arguing for an objectivist or ‘structuralist’ account which does not undervalue the importance of the indexical and negotiated aspects of interaction, and which takes seriously the Marxist-rationalist critique of empiricism and humanism and the associated idea that society should be treated as a supra-individual, preconstituted and constraining object of scientific analysis. First, Dr Layder pinpoints certain of the strengths and weaknesses of various schools of thought: social psychology (scrutinized in both its sociological and psychological forms), sociology, the Marxist-rationalist approach. Whilst rejecting the mechanistic or naively deterministic theories which are often associated with an objectivist stance, he argues that the productive activities of situated actors must be understood as existing in an articulated relationship with, and within, sets of preconstituted contextual constraints. This thesis is illustrated conceptually by the development of a framework which distinguishes two types and levels of social structure, with different modes of production and reproduction, and empirically by an analysis of aspects of interaction in the occupation of acting. | ||
999 |
_c3034 _d3034 |