| 000 | 01672 a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1782200193 | ||
| 005 | 20250317100419.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042013GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781782200192 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 25.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aMKMT _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJMAF _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aMMJT _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJMAF _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPSY000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPSY036000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a616 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aManuela Utrilla Robles | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aUpheavals in the Psychoanalytical Institutions II _bUpheavals in the Institutions |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20130731 |
||
| 300 | _a152 p | ||
| 520 | _bThis is a scholarly study in which the author explores a difficult subject matter that has been a tabooed topic in psychoanalysis. She undertakes a serious study of the underlying arguments as to why psychoanalysts have seldom been able to live in harmony with each other. In a very lucid and systematic manner, the author examines how a discipline, in this case psychoanalysis, can be manipulated to its detriment. She explains the disquieting processes that take place, which impede the development of psychoanalysis. These influences insidiously infiltrate the organisational ranks as a kind of arguing which should ostensibly enrich psychoanalysis but instead deprives it of its creativity. For a discipline to prosper, it is necessary to have the freedom to air doubts, ask questions, raise hypotheses, and contrast discoveries by sharing them with others, debating different positions to reflect on the discussions, and to change one's views if necessary. | ||
| 999 |
_c3295 _d3295 |
||