000			01907 a2200337 4500
001			1317177126
005			20250317111556.0
008			250312042016GB eng
020			_a9781317177128
037			_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 51.99 _fBB
040			_a01
041			_aeng
072	7		_aJPWL _2thema
072	7		_aJPWC _2thema
072	7		_aJPA _2thema
072	7		_aGTM _2thema
072	7		_aJPWL _2bic
072	7		_aJPVL _2bic
072	7		_aJPA _2bic
072	7		_aGTB _2bic
072	7		_aPOL034000 _2bisac
072	7		_aPOL037000 _2bisac
072	7		_aPOL000000 _2bisac
072	7		_a363.325160994 _2bisac
100	1		_aKathleen Gleeson
245	1	0	_aAustralia's 'war on terror' Discourse
250			_a1
260			_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160408
300			_a286 p
520			_bToo often, existing literature has conflated the discourses that enabled the 'War on Terror', ignoring the contextual specificities of the states that make up the ’Coalition of the Willing’. Australia's 'war on terror' Discourse fills this gap by providing a full and sustained critical analysis of Australian foreign policy discourse along with the theoretical synthesis for a specific model of critical discourse analysis of the subject. The language of then Prime Minister Howard is the primary focus of the book but attention is also paid to the language of key ministers, political opponents and other prominent actors. The voices of those who challenged the dominant discourse are also considered to shed light on the ways in which discourses can be destabilised. Kathleen Gleeson shows how Howard successfully invoked narratives of identity and sovereignty that resonated with his audience and promoted his reworked narrative of Australia whilst facing dissent from many actors who voiced their opposition most successfully when they capitalised on inconsistencies within the discourse.
999			_c3691 _d3691