000 | 01451 a2200301 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1315285835 | ||
005 | 20250317111600.0 | ||
008 | 250312042017GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781315285832 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 45.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aGTM _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_a1F _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aGTB _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_a1F _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPOL035010 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSOC008000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSOC053000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a338.951 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aBarrett L. McCormick | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aChina After Socialism: In the Footsteps of Eastern Europe or East Asia? _bIn the Footsteps of Eastern Europe or East Asia? |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20170705 |
||
300 | _a224 p | ||
520 | _bNine specialists from four continents address the following questions: is China moving toward the type of developmental state and sophisticated economic powerhouse associated with the East Asian miracle? does China's Leninist political system and the heritage of a state-run-heavy-industrial sector present too great a burden for successful transformation? and what is the likelihood that China's party-state will ultimately collapse in a fashion similar to the Leninist governments of Europe? The findings and analyses should prove interesting to followers of China, East Asia as a whole, and the European postcommunist transition. | ||
700 | 1 |
_aJonathan Unger _4A01 |
|
999 |
_c3974 _d3974 |