| 000 | 01261 a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1351527797 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111601.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042017GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781351527798 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 45.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aSOC026000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a303.36 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aJ. Roland Pennock | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aCoercion |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20170712 |
||
| 300 | _a340 p | ||
| 520 | _bCoercion, it seems, like poverty and prejudice, has always been with us. Political thinkers and philosophers have been arguing its more direct and personal consequences for centuries. Today, at a point in history marked by dramatic changes and challenges to the existing military, political, and social order, coercion is more at the forefront of political activity than ever before. While the modern state has no doubt freed man from some of the forms of coercion by which he has traditionally been plagued, we hear now from all sectors of society complaints about systematic coerciveness-not only on the national and international levels, but on the individual level as well. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aJohn W Chapman _4A01 |
|
| 999 |
_c4109 _d4109 |
||