000			02167 a2200457 4500
001			1351715984
005			20250317111605.0
008			250312042019GB eng
020			_a9781351715980
037			_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 41.99 _fBB
040			_a01
041			_aeng
072	7		_aJBCT _2thema
072	7		_aGTC _2thema
072	7		_aGTM _2thema
072	7		_aKC _2thema
072	7		_aKFFM _2thema
072	7		_aKJC _2thema
072	7		_aNH _2thema
072	7		_a1FPC _2bisac
072	7		_aJFD _2bic
072	7		_aGTC _2bic
072	7		_aGTB _2bic
072	7		_aKC _2bic
072	7		_aKFFM _2bic
072	7		_aKJC _2bic
072	7		_aH _2bic
072	7		_a1FPC _2bisac
072	7		_aLAN004000 _2bisac
072	7		_aBUS027000 _2bisac
072	7		_aBUS027020 _2bisac
072	7		_aCOM087000 _2bisac
072	7		_aSOC052000 _2bisac
072	7		_a332.04150951 _2bisac
100	1		_aZhifei Mao
245	1	0	_aDigital Media and Risk Culture in China’s Financial Markets
250			_a1
260			_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20190115
300			_a152 p
520			_bThis book analyzes the risk cultures in China that have emerged from the entanglement of new communication technologies and financial markets, examining the role that digital media play in Asian modernity and offering an alternative narrative to that of the West. The book illustrates the impact of exclusively Chinese digital media on power dynamics within risk definition, arguing that information and communication technologies (ICTs) empower individuals, enabling them to compete with an expert-oriented risk culture controlled by Government- and banker-led media outlets. With struggles, competitions, compromises, and confrontations, major communicators in financial world are collectively producing risk cultures based on interpersonal relations instead of contractual obligations, in which insider information is valued over professional analysis. Meanwhile, investors are trapped in a risk culture paradox that they themselves have produced, as they attempt to take advantage of other actors’ uncertainties and eventually produce risks for the entire market.
999			_c4456 _d4456