000 | 01826 a2200313 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1351943707 | ||
005 | 20250317111605.0 | ||
008 | 250312042017GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781351943703 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 29.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aJNF _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPP _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQDTQ _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJNF _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPP _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHPQ _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aEDU000000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aEDU003000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSOC026000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a379 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aJames Tooley | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDisestablishing the School _bDe-Bunking Justifications for State Intervention in Education |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20170705 |
||
300 | _a172 p | ||
520 | _bThat governments are, and will always be, involved in education, is taken for granted by the majority of educationalists. Recent market reforms are condemned, because they appear to undermine state intervention in education. But are justifications for state intervention in education philosophically sound? Is the attack on markets justified? In Disestablishing the School, Dr Tooley explores these issues, setting recent educational policy debates in the broader context of debates in moral and political philosophy, and philosophy of economics. Topical issues to do with equality of opportunity, education for democracy, education for autonomy, democratic control of the curriculum, and education as a public good are examined. None of these survive as a critique of markets in education, nor as a justification for state intervention in education. In undermining these arguments, Dr Tooley argues that the case for the disestablishment of the school, for the separation of school and state, can be philosophically sustained. | ||
999 |
_c4479 _d4479 |