000 | 01912 a2200361 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 131729761X | ||
005 | 20250317111606.0 | ||
008 | 250312042017GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781317297611 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 44.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aQRMF12 _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQRM _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQRVC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQRS _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aNHC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQRA _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHRCF1 _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHRCG _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHRKP _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHBLA1 _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHRA _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aREL000000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aREL006090 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a223.8066 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aThomas M. Bolin | |
245 | 1 | 0 | _aEcclesiastes and the Riddle of Authorship |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20170327 |
||
300 | _a156 p | ||
520 | _bIn Ecclesiastes, the authorial voice of Qohelet presents an identity that has challenged readers for centuries. This book offers a reception history of the different ways readers have constructed Qohelet as an author. Previous reception histories of Ecclesiastes group readings into "premodern" and "critical," or separate Jewish from Christian readings. In deliberate contrast, this analysis arranges readings thematically according to the interpretive potential inherent in the text, a method of biblical reception history articulated by Brennan Breed. Doing so erases the artificial distinctions between so-called scholarly and confessional readings and highlights the fact that many modern academic readings of the authorship of Ecclesiastes travel in well-worn interpretive paths that long predate the rise of critical scholarship. Thus this book offers a reminder that, while critical biblical scholarship is an essential part of the interpretive task, academic readings are themselves indebted to the Bible’s reception history and a part of it. | ||
999 |
_c4546 _d4546 |