000 | 02334 a2200361 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1317201434 | ||
005 | 20250317111609.0 | ||
008 | 250312042016GB 8 eng | ||
020 | _a9781317201434 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 47.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aJPS _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHBC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPDA _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQD _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPS _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHBC _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPDA _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHP _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPOL000000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a327 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aAnnette Freyberg-Inan | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvaluating Progress in International Relations _bHow do you know? |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20161004 |
||
300 | _a234 p | ||
520 | _bThis edited volume offers a systematic evaluation of how knowledge is produced by scholarly research into International Relations. The contributors explore three key questions: To what extent is scientific progress and accumulation of knowledge possible? What are the different accounts of how this process takes place? And what are the dominant critiques of these understandings? It is the first publication to survey the full range of perspectives available for evaluating scientific progress as well as dominant critiques of scientism. In its second part, the volume applies this range of perspectives to the research program on the democratic peace. It shows what we gain by accommodating and enabling dialogue among the full range of epistemological approaches. The contributors elaborate and defend the epistemological position of sociable pluralism as one that seeks to build bridges between soft positivism, critical theory, and critical realism. The underlying idea is that if the differences between the various approaches used by different communities of researchers can be understood more clearly, this will facilitate meaningful cross-cutting communication, dialogue, and debate and thereby enable us to address real-world problems more effectively. This timely and original work will be of great interest to advanced-level students and scholars dealing with philosophy of science and methodological questions in International Relations. | ||
700 | 1 |
_aEwan Harrison _4B01 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aPatrick James _4B01 |
|
999 |
_c4770 _d4770 |