| 000 | 01397 a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 131725919X | ||
| 005 | 20250317111612.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042015GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781317259190 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 29.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aJP _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJP _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a327.7305193 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aWalter C. Clemens Jr | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aGetting to Yes in Korea |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20151117 |
||
| 300 | _a256 p | ||
| 520 | _bPresident George W. Bush had pinned North Korea to an "axis of evil" but then neglected Pyongyang until it tested a nuclear device. Would the new administration make similar mistakes? When the Clinton White House prepared to bomb North Korea's nuclear facilities, private citizen Jimmy Carter mediated to avert war and set the stage for a deal freezing North Korea's plutonium production. The 1994 Agreed Framework collapsed after eight years, but when Pyongyang went critical, the negotiations got serious. Each time the parties advanced one or two steps, however, their advance seemed to spawn one or two steps backward. Clemens distils lessons from U.S. negotiations with North Korea, Russia, China, and Libya and analyses how they do-and do not-apply to six-party and bilateral talks with North Korea in a new political era. | ||
| 999 |
_c4992 _d4992 |
||