| 000 | 01294 a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1317241169 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111614.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042016GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781317241164 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 37.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aNHAH _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a3M _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHBAH _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a3J _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHIS016000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHIS000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a901 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aG. J. Renier | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHistory _bIts Purpose and Method |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160414 |
||
| 300 | _a274 p | ||
| 520 | _bThis treatise of historical methodology, originally published in 1950 is based upon a liberal conception of history which excludes no narrator of past events from the ranks of historians. It defines history as the accurate story which preserves the memory of the past experiences of human societies. The functionof history determines its method and provides the answer to the question: how secure is our knowledge of the past? In the author’s view, history is empirical and its results are for ever provisional. The relative merits of dogmatism and scepticism are examined and several interpretations among English historians are scrutinized. | ||
| 999 |
_c5174 _d5174 |
||