| 000 | 01790 a2200337 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1317386027 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111625.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042016GB 4 eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781317386025 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 44.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aQDTS _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHBA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKCA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPDA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHPS _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHBA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKCA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPDA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI034000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI013000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a300.1 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aMark Risjord | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aNormativity and Naturalism in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160122 |
||
| 300 | _a280 p | ||
| 520 | _bNormativity and Naturalism in the Social Sciences engages with a central debate within the philosophy of social science: whether social scientific explanation necessitates an appeal to norms, and if so, whether appeals to normativity can be rendered "scientific." This collection brings together contributions from a diverse group of philosophers who explore a broad but thematically unified set of questions, many of which stem from an ongoing debate between Stephen Turner and Joseph Rouse (both contributors to this volume) on the role of naturalism in the philosophy of the social sciences. Informed by recent developments in both philosophy and the social sciences, this volume will set the benchmark for contemporary discussions about normativity and naturalism. This collection will be relevant to philosophers of social science, philosophers in interested in the rule following and metaphysics of normativity, and theoretically oriented social scientists. | ||
| 999 |
_c6149 _d6149 |
||