| 000 | 02350 a2200469 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1317086171 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111625.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042016GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781317086178 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 55.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNT _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNF _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAM _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHM _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJBFH _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aGTM _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJBSL _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a1F _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNT _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNF _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAM _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHM _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJFFN _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aGTB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJFSL _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a1F _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW075000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW026000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a340.115 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aDaniela Berti | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aOf Doubt and Proof _bRitual and Legal Practices of Judgment |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160303 |
||
| 300 | _a224 p | ||
| 520 | _bAll institutions concerned with the process of judging - whether it be deciding between alternative courses of action, determining a judge’s professional integrity, assigning culpability for an alleged crime, or ruling on the credibility of an asylum claimant - are necessarily directly concerned with the question of doubt. By putting ritual and judicial settings into comparative perspective, in contexts as diverse as Indian and Taiwanese divination and international cricket, as well as legal processes in France, the UK, India, Denmark, and Ghana, this book offers a comprehensive and novel perspective on techniques for casting and dispelling doubt, and the roles they play in achieving verdicts or decisions that appear both valid and just. Broadening the theoretical understandings of the social role of doubt, both in social science and in law, the authors present these understandings in ways that not only contribute to academic knowledge but are also useful to professionals and other participants engaged in the process of judging. This collection will consequently be of great interest to academics researching in the fields of legal anthropology, ritual studies, legal sociology, criminology, and socio-legal studies. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aAnthony Good _4A01 |
|
| 999 |
_c6168 _d6168 |
||