| 000 | 01769 a2200337 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1351911384 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111627.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042017GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781351911382 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 42.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aQDHF _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPDX _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aN _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aNHAH _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a3M _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHPCB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPDX _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHBLH _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHBAH _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHIS000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a149.91 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aConstance Blackwell | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPhilosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries _bConversations with Aristotle |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20170515 |
||
| 300 | _a438 p | ||
| 520 | _bThis volume offers an important re-evaluation of early modern philosophy. It takes issue with the received notion of a ’revolution’ in philosophical thought in the 17th-century, making the case for treating the 16th and 17th centuries together. Taking up Charles Schmitt’s formulation of the many ’Aristotelianisms’ of the period, the papers bring out the variety and richness of the approaches to Aristotle, rather than treating his as a homogeneous system of thought. Based on much new research, they provide case studies of how philosophers used, developed, and reacted to the framework of Aristotelian logic, categories and distinctions, and demonstrate that Aristotelianism possessed both the flexibility and the dynamism to exert a continuing impact - even among such noted ’anti-Aristotelians’ as Descartes and Hobbes. This constant engagement can indeed be termed ’conversations with Aristotle’. | ||
| 700 | 1 |
_aSachiko Kusukawa _4A01 |
|
| 999 |
_c6317 _d6317 |
||