| 000 | 02574 a2200481 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1315391007 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111627.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042019GB 2 eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781315391007 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 34.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aKCA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aQDTS _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKCP _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aQDTQ _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPHV _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPP _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKCA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHPS _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aKCP _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHPQ _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPHV _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPP _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI019000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aBUS069030 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aBUS000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aBUS069000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI005000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI034000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL007000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL010000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPOL024000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a321.8 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aJulian F. Müller | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPolitical Pluralism, Disagreement and Justice _bThe Case for Polycentric Democracy |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20190510 |
||
| 300 | _a234 p | ||
| 520 | _bThis book poses the question: How can we organize society in such a way that our disagreement about facts and norms works to the benefit of everyone? In response, it makes the argument for polycentric democracy, a political arrangement consisting of various political units that enjoy different degrees of independence. It is argued that to progress towards justice, we first need to change our attitude towards reasonable disagreement. Theorists have always viewed reasonable disagreement as nuisance, if not as a threat. However, this work puts forward that the diversity of perspectives which underlie reasonable disagreement should be viewed as a resource to be harvested rather than a threat to be tamed. Resting on two key arguments, the author proposes the idea of polycentric democracy as the most capable method of making pluralism productive. The book explores what such a political order might look like and concludes that only an institutional system which is capable of profiting from diversity, such as polycentric democracy, might reasonably be expected to generate an overlapping consensus. Continuing in the tradition of Karl Popper and Friedrich August von Hayek, this book lies at the intersection of philosophy, political economy and political theory. It will be of great interest to academics and scholars working in philosophy, politics and economics. | ||
| 999 |
_c6390 _d6390 |
||