000			02028 a2200349 4500
001			1317071174
005			20250317111630.0
008			250312042016GB eng
020			_a9781317071174
037			_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 42.99 _fBB
040			_a01
041			_aeng
072	7		_aDSB _2thema
072	7		_aN _2thema
072	7		_aQRA _2thema
072	7		_a1DDU _2bisac
072	7		_a3M _2bisac
072	7		_aDSBD _2bic
072	7		_aHBLH _2bic
072	7		_aHRA _2bic
072	7		_a1DBK _2bisac
072	7		_aLIT019000 _2bisac
072	7		_aHIS037040 _2bisac
072	7		_aLIT000000 _2bisac
072	7		_a820.9384 _2bisac
100	1		_aJennifer Clement
245	1	0	_aReading Humility in Early Modern England
250			_a1
260			_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160303
300			_a166 p
520			_bWhile humility is not especially valued in modern Western culture, Jennifer Clement argues here, it is central to sixteenth- and seventeenth-century understandings of Christian faith and behavior, and is vital to early modern concepts of the self. As this study shows, early modern literary engagements with humility link it to self-knowledge through the practice of right reading, and make humility foundational to any proper understanding of human agency. Yet humility has received little critical interest, and has often been misunderstood as a false virtue that engenders only self-abjection. This study offers an overview of various ways in which humility is discussed, deployed, or resisted in early modern texts ranging from the explicitly religious and autobiographical prose of Katherine Parr and John Donne, to the more politically motivated prose of Queen Elizabeth I and the seventeenth-century reformer and radical Thomas Tryon. As part of the wider 'turn to religion' in early modern studies, this study seeks to complicate our understanding of a mainstream early modern virtue, and to problematize a mode of critical analysis that assumes agency is always defined by resistance.
999			_c6662 _d6662