000 02799 a2200349 4500
001 1351906054
005 20250317111631.0
008 250312042019GB eng
020 _a9781351906050
037 _bTaylor & Francis
_cGBP 42.99
_fBB
040 _a01
041 _aeng
072 7 _aN
_2thema
072 7 _aQRAX
_2thema
072 7 _aNHD
_2thema
072 7 _aCJ
_2thema
072 7 _a2ADF
_2bisac
072 7 _a3M
_2bisac
072 7 _aHBLH
_2bic
072 7 _aHRAX
_2bic
072 7 _aHBJD
_2bic
072 7 _aCJ
_2bic
072 7 _a2ADF
_2bisac
072 7 _aHIS000000
_2bisac
072 7 _a271.97404409032
_2bisac
100 1 _aLaurence Lux-Sterritt
245 1 0 _aRedefining Female Religious Life
_bFrench Ursulines and English Ladies in Seventeenth-Century Catholicism
250 _a1
260 _aOxford
_bRoutledge
_c20190604
300 _a244 p
520 _bThis short study offers a contribution to the flourishing debate on post-Reformation female piety. In an effort to avoid excessive polarization condemning conventual life as restrictive or hailing it as a privileged path towards spiritual perfection, it analyses the reasons which led early-modern women to found new congregations with active vocations. Were these novel communities born out of their founders' rejection of the conventual model? Through the comparative analysis of two congregations which became, in seventeenth-century France and England, the embodiment of women's efforts to become actively involved in the Catholic Reformation, this book offers a nuanced interpretation of female religious life and particularly of the relationship between cloistered tradition and aposotolic vocations. Despite the differences in their national political and religious backgrounds, both the French Ursulines and the Institute of English Ladies shared the same aim to revitalise the links between the Catholic faith and the people, reaching out of the cloister and into the world by educating girls who would later become wives and mothers. This study suggests that these pioneering Catholic women, though in breach of Tridentine decrees, did not turn their backs on contemplative piety: although both the French Ursulines and the English Ladies undertook work which had hitherto been the preserve religious men, they were motivated by their desire to help the Church rather than by a wish to liberate women from what eighteenth-century writers later perceived as the shackles of conventual obedience. It is argued that the founders of new, uncloistered congregations were embracing vocations which they construed as personals sacrifices; they followed the arduous path 'mixed life' in an act of self-abnegation and chose apostolic work as their early-modern reinterpretation of medieval asceticism.
999 _c6699
_d6699