000 | 01586 a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 135190518X | ||
005 | 20250317111631.0 | ||
008 | 250312042017GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781351905183 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 42.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aQRAB _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQD _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHRAB _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHP _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aREL000000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a230 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aD.Z. Phillips | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aReligion and Friendly Fire _bExamining Assumptions in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20170302 |
||
300 | _a191 p | ||
520 | _bIn locating friendly fire in contemporary philosophy of religion, D.Z. Phillips shows that more harm can be done to religion by its philosophical defenders than by its philosophical despisers. Friendly fire is the result of an uncritical acceptance of empiricism, and Phillips argues that we need to examine critically the claims that individual consciousness is the necessary starting point from which we have to argue: for the existence of an external world and the reality of God; that God is a person without a body, a pure consciousness; and that to assent to a religious belief is essentially to assign a truth value to a proposition independent of any confessional context. When these products of friendly fire are avoided, we arrive at a new understanding of belief, trust and the soul, and refuse to say more or less than we know about the realities of human life in the service of religious apologetics. | ||
999 |
_c6742 _d6742 |