000 | 01819 a2200337 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 131767054X | ||
005 | 20250317111638.0 | ||
008 | 250312042014GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781317670544 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 51.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aQDHA _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aDB _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aNHC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_a1QBAG _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHPCA _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aDB _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHBLA1 _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_a1QDAG _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHIS002000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHIS002010 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aPHI002000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a183.1 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aDavid Rankin | |
245 | 1 | 0 | _aSophists, Socratics and Cynics (Routledge Revivals) |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20140627 |
||
300 | _a266 p | ||
520 | _bThe Sophists, the Socratics and the Cynics had one important characteristic in common: they mainly used spoken natural language as their instrument of investigation, and they were more concerned to discover human nature in its various practical manifestations than the facts of the physical world. The Sophists are too often remembered merely as the opponents of Socrates and Plato. Rankin discusses what social needs prompted the development of their theories and provided a market for their teaching. Five prominent Sophists – Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus, Hippias and Thrasymachus – are looked at individually. The author discusses their origins, aims and arguments, and relates the issues they focussed on to debates apparent in contemporary literature. Sophists, Socratics and Cynics, first published in 1983, also traces the sophistic strand in Greek thought beyond the great barrier of Plato, emphasising continuity with the Cynics, and concludes with a look forward to Epicureans and Stoics. | ||
999 |
_c7310 _d7310 |