| 000 | 02546 a2200433 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1351709860 | ||
| 005 | 20250317111638.0 | ||
| 008 | 250312042018GB eng | ||
| 020 | _a9781351709866 | ||
| 037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 43.99 _fBB |
||
| 040 | _a01 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aLB _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNKJ _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPST _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNC _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aQDTQ _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLA _2thema |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLB _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLNKJ _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPST _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aRNC _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHPQ _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLA _2bic |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW000000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW034000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW051000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aNAT010000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI034000 _2bisac |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_a344.046 _2bisac |
|
| 100 | 1 | _aMoa De Lucia Dahlbeck | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSpinoza, Ecology and International Law _bRadical Naturalism in the Face of the Anthropocene |
| 250 | _a1 | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20180912 |
||
| 300 | _a196 p | ||
| 520 | _bThis book addresses the use of Benedict Spinoza’s philosophy in current attempts to elaborate an ecological basis for international environmental law. Because the question of environmental protection has not been satisfactory resolved, the legal debate concerning our responsibility for the environment has – as evidenced in the recent UN report series Harmony with Nature – come to invite calls for a new eco-centric, rather than anthropocentric, legal paradigm. In this respect, Spinoza appears as a key figure. He is one of the few philosophers in the history of western philosophy who cares, and writes extensively, about the roots of anthropocentrism; the core issue of contemporary normative debates in ecology. And in response to the rapidly developing ecological crisis, his work has become central to a re-thinking of the human relationship with nature. Addressing the contention that Spinoza’s ethics might provide a useful source for developing a new, eco-centred framework for environmental law, this book elaborates a more nuanced understanding of Spinoza’s philosophy. Spinoza cannot, it is argued here, simply be reduced to an eco-ethicist. That is: his metaphysics cannot be used as basis of an essentially naturalised or extended human morality. At the same time, however, this book argues that the radicality of Spinoza’s naturalism nevertheless offers the possibility of developing a more adequate ecological basis for environmental law. | ||
| 999 |
_c7347 _d7347 |
||