000 | 01947 a2200325 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1317014162 | ||
005 | 20250317111640.0 | ||
008 | 250312042016GB eng | ||
020 | _a9781317014164 | ||
037 |
_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 41.99 _fBB |
||
040 | _a01 | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJBCC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aQDTQ _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLNTM _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHB _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJFC _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aHPQ _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLNTM _2bic |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSOC002010 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_aSOC026000 _2bisac |
|
072 | 7 |
_a616.0795 _2bisac |
|
100 | 1 | _aEric A. Jensen | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTherapeutic Cloning Debate _bGlobal Science and Journalism in the Public Sphere |
250 | _a1 | ||
260 |
_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20160303 |
||
300 | _a246 p | ||
520 | _bExploring the controversy surrounding therapeutic human cloning, this book draws upon data collected from news articles and interviews with journalists to examine the role of mass media in shaping biomedical controversies. With specific reference to the US and the UK as two leading scientific nations grappling with the global issue of therapeutic cloning, together with attention to the important role played by nations in Southeast Asia, this book sheds light on media representations of scientific developments, the unrealistic hype that can surround them, the influence of religion and the potentially harmful imposition of journalistic and nationalist values on the scientific field. Empirically grounded and theoretically innovative, The Therapeutic Cloning Debate will appeal to social scientists across a range of disciplines with interests in science communication, public engagement, cultural and media studies, science politics, science journalism, the sociology of expert knowledge and risk. It will also appeal to scientists, journalists, policymakers and others interested in how news media frame science for the public. | ||
999 |
_c7544 _d7544 |