000 02478 a2200373 4500
001 1317631358
005 20250317111642.0
008 250312042015GB 4 eng
020 _a9781317631354
037 _bTaylor & Francis
_cGBP 47.99
_fBB
040 _a01
041 _aeng
072 7 _aJPSN
_2thema
072 7 _aLBBR
_2thema
072 7 _aQDTS
_2thema
072 7 _aJPVH
_2thema
072 7 _aJHB
_2thema
072 7 _aJPSN
_2bic
072 7 _aLBBR
_2bic
072 7 _aHPS
_2bic
072 7 _aJPVH
_2bic
072 7 _aJHB
_2bic
072 7 _aPOL000000
_2bisac
072 7 _aPOL010000
_2bisac
072 7 _aPOL011000
_2bisac
072 7 _a345.01
_2bisac
100 1 _aKlaus Bachmann
245 1 0 _aUN International Criminal Tribunals
_bTransition without Justice?
250 _a1
260 _aOxford
_bRoutledge
_c20150324
300 _a306 p
520 _bBoth the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) are now about to close. Bachmann and Fatic look back at the achievements and shortcomings of both tribunals from an interdisciplinary perspective informed by sociology, political science, history, and philosophy of law and based upon on two key notions: the concepts of legitimacy and efficiency. The first asks to what extent the input (creation) of, the ICTY and the ICTR can be regarded as legitimate in light of the legal and public debate in the early 1990s. The second confronts the output (the procedures and decisions) of the ICTY and the ICTR with the tasks both tribunals were assigned by the UN Security Council, the General Assembly, and by key organs (the president and the chief prosecutors). The authors investigate to what extent the ICTY and the ICTR have delivered the expected results, whether they have been able to contribute to 'the maintenance of peace', 'stabilization' of the conflict regions, or even managed to provide 'reconciliation' to Rwanda. Furthermore, the book is concerned with how many criminals, over whom the ICTY and the ICTR wield jurisdiction, have actually been prosecuted and at what cost. Offering the first balanced and in depth analysis of the International Criminal Tribunals, the volume provides an important insight into what lessons have been learned, and how a deeper understanding of the successes and failures can benefit the international legal community in the future.
700 1 _aAleksandar Fatić
_4A01
999 _c7719
_d7719