000			01888 a2200373 4500
001			1040303471
005			20250328151419.0
008			250324042024GB eng
020			_a9781040303474 _qEA
037			_bTaylor & Francis _cGBP 52.99 _fBB
040			_a01
041			_aeng
072	7		_aQRM _2thema
072	7		_aNHC _2thema
072	7		_aQRAB _2thema
072	7		_aQRAX _2thema
072	7		_aQRS _2thema
072	7		_aHRC _2bic
072	7		_aHBLA1 _2bic
072	7		_aHRAB _2bic
072	7		_aHRAX _2bic
072	7		_aHRKP _2bic
072	7		_aREL000000 _2bisac
072	7		_aREL108000 _2bisac
072	7		_aREL051000 _2bisac
072	7		_aREL033000 _2bisac
072	7		_a228 _2bisac
100	1		_aL. A. Garrard
245	1	0	_aAthens or Jerusalem? _bA Study in Christian Comprehension
250			_a1
260			_aOxford _bRoutledge _c20241202
300			_a182 p
520			_b‘What has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What agreement is there between the Academy and the Church?’ Tertullian’s outburst is still being echoed in some quarters, notably in the Biblical Theology School, which tries to minimize the influence of Greek thought on the Christian tradition. There are some circles in the World Council of Churches which would use its new formula of doctrinal orthodoxy to exclude the Unitarians and Quakers. Yet as Ernest Scott wrote, ‘Liberty is inherent in the Christian Faith, and liberty always makes for difference’. Athens or Jerusalem? (first published in 1965), based on the Minns Lectures of 1963, is unique as it gives a comprehensive survey of Christian thought and is designed to show that it is an amalgam of elements from both Athens and Jerusalem, and other sources as well. It concludes with a consideration of the question: how far is it possible to diverge from the mainstream of Christianity without ceasing to be Christian?
999			_c8063 _d8063