Religion and Friendly Fire (Record no. 6742)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01586 a2200265 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 135190518X
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250317111631.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250312042017GB eng
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781351905183
037 ## - SOURCE OF ACQUISITION
Source of stock number/acquisition Taylor & Francis
Terms of availability GBP 42.99
Form of issue BB
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency 01
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code QRAB
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code QD
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code HRAB
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code HP
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code REL000000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code 230
Source bisac
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name D.Z. Phillips
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Religion and Friendly Fire
Remainder of title Examining Assumptions in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Oxford
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Routledge
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 20170302
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 191 p
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Expansion of summary note In locating friendly fire in contemporary philosophy of religion, D.Z. Phillips shows that more harm can be done to religion by its philosophical defenders than by its philosophical despisers. Friendly fire is the result of an uncritical acceptance of empiricism, and Phillips argues that we need to examine critically the claims that individual consciousness is the necessary starting point from which we have to argue: for the existence of an external world and the reality of God; that God is a person without a body, a pure consciousness; and that to assent to a religious belief is essentially to assign a truth value to a proposition independent of any confessional context. When these products of friendly fire are avoided, we arrive at a new understanding of belief, trust and the soul, and refuse to say more or less than we know about the realities of human life in the service of religious apologetics.

No items available.