testing all

Myth of Liberal Ascendancy (Record no. 2047)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01654 a2200241 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 1612052568
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250317100408.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250312042013GB eng
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781612052564
037 ## - SOURCE OF ACQUISITION
Source of stock number/acquisition Taylor & Francis
Terms of availability GBP 36.99
Form of issue BB
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency 01
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code JHB
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code JHB
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code SOC026000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code 338.740973
Source bisac
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name G. Williams Domhoff
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Myth of Liberal Ascendancy
Remainder of title Corporate Dominance from the Great Depression to the Great Recession
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Oxford
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Routledge
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 20131130
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 320 p
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Expansion of summary note Based on new archival research, G. Williams Domhoff challenges popular conceptions of the 1930's New Deal. Arguing instead that this period was one of increasing corporate dominance in government affairs, affecting the fate of American workers up to the present day. While FDR's New Deal brought sweeping legislation, the tide turned quickly after 1938. From that year onward nearly every major new economic law passed by Congress showed the mark of corporate dominance. Domhoff accessibly portrays documents of the Committee's vital influence in the halls of government, supported by his interviews with several of its key employees and trustees. Domhoff concludes that in terms of economic influence, liberalism was on a long steady decline, despite two decades of post-war growing equality, and that ironically, it was the successes of the civil rights, feminist, environmental, and gay-lesbian movements-not a new corporate mobilisation-that led to the final defeat of the liberal-labour alliance after 1968.

No items available.