Private Property, Community Development, and Eminent Domain (Record no. 2426)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02358 a2200397 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 1138275530 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250317100412.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 250312042016GB eng |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
| International Standard Book Number | 9781138275539 |
| 037 ## - SOURCE OF ACQUISITION | |
| Source of stock number/acquisition | Taylor & Francis |
| Terms of availability | GBP 51.99 |
| Form of issue | BB |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Original cataloging agency | 01 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LNT |
| Source | thema |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LNCD |
| Source | thema |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LBBR |
| Source | thema |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | RGC |
| Source | thema |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | JHB |
| Source | thema |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | GTM |
| Source | thema |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | 1K |
| Source | bisac |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LNT |
| Source | bic |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LNCD |
| Source | bic |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LBBR |
| Source | bic |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | RGC |
| Source | bic |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | JHB |
| Source | bic |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | GTB |
| Source | bic |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | 1K |
| Source | bisac |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LAW052000 |
| Source | bisac |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | LAW000000 |
| Source | bisac |
| 072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE | |
| Subject category code | 343.0252 |
| Source | bisac |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Robin Paul Malloy |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Private Property, Community Development, and Eminent Domain |
| 250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT | |
| Edition statement | 1 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Oxford |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Routledge |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 20161128 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 230 p |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Expansion of summary note | The contributors in this volume address the fundamental relationship between the state and its citizens, and among the people themselves. Discussion centers on a recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v. City of New London. This case involved the use of eminent domain power to acquire private property for purposes of transferring it by the State to another private party that would make "better" economic use of the land. This type of state action has been identified as an "economic development taking". In the Kelo case, the Court held that the action was legal within provisions of the US Constitution but the opinion was contentious among some of the Justices and has been met with significant negative outcry from the public. The Kelo case and the public debate arising in its aftermath give cause to assess the legal landscape related to the ability of government to fairly balance the tension between private property and the public interest. The tension and the need to successfully strike a balance are not unique to any one country or any one political system. From the United States to the United Kingdom, to the People's Republic of China, property and its legal regulation are of prime importance to matters of economic development and civic institution building. The Kelo decision, therefore, explores a rich set of legal principles with broad applicability. |
No items available.