testing all

Comparative Deviance (Record no. 559)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02427 a2200265 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 1412807697
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250317100355.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250312042008GB eng
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781412807692
037 ## - SOURCE OF ACQUISITION
Source of stock number/acquisition Taylor & Francis
Terms of availability GBP 45.99
Form of issue BB
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency 01
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code JHB
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code JHB
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code LAW000000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code SOC026000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code 302.542
Source bisac
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Graeme R. Newman
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Comparative Deviance
Remainder of title Perception and Law in Six Cultures
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Oxford
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Routledge
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 20080229
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 352 p
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Expansion of summary note "Comparative Deviance" represents a systematic attempt to survey public perceptions of deviant behavior cross-culturally: in India, Indonesia, Iran, Italy, Yugoslavia and the United States. There is extensive diversity in both law and perception concerning such deviances as taking drugs, homosexuality, and abortion, yet there is evidence for a basically invariant structure in perception of deviance across all cultures. Within the countries studied in this volume, Geraeme Newman discovers that the strength of religious belief and urban rural background accounted for major differences in the perception of deviance - when differences were identified.Contrary to popular academic opinion in the United States, Newman finds that those countries with the most liberal laws on deviance (i.e., the least punitive sanctions) are also those highly economically developed and least totalitarian (United States and Italy). But when public opinion is considered, the public favors harsher punishments than the law provides. In contrast, in the developing countries of India, Iran and Indonesia, where penal sanctions are more severe, public opinion is much more liberal. The crucial question is the role criminal law plays in the process of modernization: whether law is a stable cultural influence, round which public opinion wavers in a startling fashion, depending on the stage of modernization.These findings challenge many assumptions of conflict theory in sociology, of cultural relativism in anthropology, and of ethical relativism in moral philosophy. All findings are examined in relation to research on modernization, social development, and the evolution of law. These fundamental issues are thus important to many different disciplines across the board.
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Marvin E. Wolfgang
Relationship A01

No items available.