Definitions (Record no. 739)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01817 a2200253 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 113886837X
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250317100356.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250312042015GB eng
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781138868373
037 ## - SOURCE OF ACQUISITION
Source of stock number/acquisition Taylor & Francis
Terms of availability GBP 35.99
Form of issue BB
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency 01
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code C
Source thema
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code C
Source bic
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code LAN000000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code LAN009000
Source bisac
072 7# - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code 413.028
Source bisac
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Annabel Cormack
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Definitions
Remainder of title Implications for Syntax, Semantics, and the Language of Thought
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Oxford
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Routledge
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 20150521
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 362 p
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Expansion of summary note The answer to the question "How can we understand and use a definition?" provides new constraints on natural language and on the internal language in which meaning is mentally represented. Most syntax takes the sentence as the basic unit for well-formedness, but definitions force us to focus on words and phrases, and hence to focus on compositional syntax in parallel with compositional semantics. This study examines both dictionary definitions and definitions from textbooks, from the points of view of their syntax, semantics, and use for learning word meaning. The tools used throughout are Principles and Parameters syntax, Relevance theoretic pragmatics, Model theoretic semantics, and the formal theory of definitions. The analyses argue that because phrases can be understood in isolation, some standard syntactic analyses must be modified. 'NP movement' has to be reanalysed as transmission of theta roles. These ideas are then applied to a variety of adjectives which take propositional complements. The final chapter argues that for definitions to be understood, the syntax of the Language of Thought must be close to that of Natural Language in specifiable way.

No items available.